Go to the National Archives document worksheet collection and print off the appropriate worksheet for the source(s) you are using.
To receive credit you must print out and staple a hard copy of the source you are reviewing to your worksheet. (Your source should have evidence of your reviewing; i.e. highlighter, notes, etc.)
Friday, June 6, 2014
Thursday, May 22, 2014
Period 6 Panel Discussion
Period 5 Panel Discussions
Group 1 ECJ (Thursday)
Britt H., Lynn, Kaitlyn B., Duncan, Alexis, Britt C., Eli, Marcus
Arguments for data removal
Article 1
Article 2
Arguments for freedom of information
Article 1
Group 2 EU Common Defense
Abigail, Emma, Kaylin, Angela, Carlene, Riley, Hannah, Erik
Article 1
Article 2
Arguments against common defense
Article 1
Article 2
Britt H., Lynn, Kaitlyn B., Duncan, Alexis, Britt C., Eli, Marcus
Arguments for data removal
Article 1
Article 2
Arguments for freedom of information
Article 1
Group 2 EU Common Defense
Abigail, Emma, Kaylin, Angela, Carlene, Riley, Hannah, Erik
Article 1
Article 2
Arguments against common defense
Article 1
Article 2
Monday, May 19, 2014
3rd Period Panel Discussions
Group A ECJ ruling
Will, Dylan, Shelby, Kylie, Jesse, Davis, Katie, Amelia
Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
Article 4
Group B One Child Policy
Sydney, Rachel, Emily, Devon, Raja, Alexis, Jayden
Article 1
Group C Changing of US election process
Joe, Alex A., Jack, Griffith, Tristan, Gabe, Declan, Ryan
Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
Article 4
Article 5
Group D Gun Control
Max, Alex D., Austin, Ben, Ian, Paige, Carolyn, Kelsey
Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
Article 4
Pro gun control arguments
Article 4
Article 5
Will, Dylan, Shelby, Kylie, Jesse, Davis, Katie, Amelia
Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
Article 4
Group B One Child Policy
Sydney, Rachel, Emily, Devon, Raja, Alexis, Jayden
Article 1
Group C Changing of US election process
Joe, Alex A., Jack, Griffith, Tristan, Gabe, Declan, Ryan
Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
Article 4
Article 5
Group D Gun Control
Max, Alex D., Austin, Ben, Ian, Paige, Carolyn, Kelsey
Article 1
Article 2
Article 3
Article 4
Pro gun control arguments
Article 4
Article 5
4th period panel discussions
Group A Sensorship of the Media
Lindsey, Laura, Hannah, Jen, Brendan, Kaitlyn, Sage, Bre
Arguments for Freedom
Article 1
Article 2
Arguments
Article 1
Group B ECJ Ruling
Zach, Josh, Quinnnn, Noelle, Maddy, Kama, Carl, Seth
For use in explaining what the phrase "the right to be forgotten" actually means: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27394751
Professional opinion to be used to back the argument that the ECJ made the wrong decision:
Group C Nigeria - Failed state or not
Haley, Amalia, Alec, Vanessa, Olivia, Chloe, Aidan, Brian
Arguments while Nigeria will collapse
Article 1
Article 2
Group D Drones
Luke, Blake, Cal, Alex, Riley, Demetri, Blake, Megan, Morgan
Arguments For
Article 1
Article 2
Arguments Against
Article 1
Article 2
Lindsey, Laura, Hannah, Jen, Brendan, Kaitlyn, Sage, Bre
Arguments for Freedom
Article 1
Article 2
Arguments
Article 1
Group B ECJ Ruling
Zach, Josh, Quinnnn, Noelle, Maddy, Kama, Carl, Seth
For use in explaining what the phrase "the right to be forgotten" actually means: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27394751
Professional opinion to be used to back the argument that the ECJ made the wrong decision:
Description of what the consequences of the ruling are/will be: http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2344458/european-court-rules-that-search-engines-must-remove-content-on-request
Summary of what decision the ECJ made and when they did so: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27388289
Group C Nigeria - Failed state or not
Haley, Amalia, Alec, Vanessa, Olivia, Chloe, Aidan, Brian
Arguments while Nigeria will collapse
Article 1
Article 2
Group D Drones
Luke, Blake, Cal, Alex, Riley, Demetri, Blake, Megan, Morgan
Arguments For
Article 1
Article 2
Arguments Against
Article 1
Article 2
Panel Discussions
PANEL DISCUSSION
The panel discussion will allow you to become an expert in a
subject in order to present and defend an argument to the class.
Here are the requirements:
- Research
your topic thoroughly. This should
be done well in advance of the panel discussion.
- By Thursday (5/22) prior to the panel discussion, provide me with the best article
supporting your side of the argument.
I will post these on line. (the class needs to be able prep)
- Present
an opening statement, approximately five minutes in length. All members of the team must speak, and
you must coordinate your opening so that it is a coherent statement of
your position.
- Use a
Powerpoint presentation or transparency during the opening statement that
outlines your argument. (To save time these need to be on a zip drive- all members are responsible)
- An annotated
bibliography is due at the time of your presentation. It must include at least six
sources. This may include your
textbook and must include other well-respected sources, such as The New York Times, The Christian
Science Monitor, The Economist, and BBC. Issues and Controversies, located in the
Creek database, is also a good source.
- Answer
analytical questions from the audience. Audience members will write these
in advance, after reading the articles provided by both team.
- For each panel discussion, audience members will need to prepare 4 questions, written ahead of time, to ask the panel members. I will check these off ahead before the panel begins.
Here are the following topics
*You will need to decide as a group you is which side of the debate. Do this right away so members can team up and begin searching for information
ECJ: Ruling that Google must respect privacy wishes: Can people request that google remove personal information they find offensive?
ECJ: Ruling that Google must respect privacy wishes: Can people request that google remove personal information they find offensive?
Russia: Due to recent electoral fraud, United Russia
and Vladimir Putin have lost legitimacy.
China: Market socialism has weakened the legitimacy
of the Chinese communist government.
Nigeria: Democracy in Nigeria will collapse due to
conflict and corruption.
Iran:
Hardliners have consolidated their power in Iran and thereby crushing the
pro-democracy movement.
Systems of Government: Proportional representations results in more effective policy-making than a single-member district system. Should the US adopt an alternative elections system? (PR or MMP)
Friday, May 16, 2014
North Korea
Watch the following video and answer the questions below:
Frontline: North Korea
Type of government:
Describe the Institutions: (exectutive, legislative, judicial, bureaucracy, military)
Describe Elite recruitment
Election type (PR or SMD)
Civil Society
Media
Economy (scope of government intervention)
Political parties (opposition)
Frontline: North Korea
Type of government:
Describe the Institutions: (exectutive, legislative, judicial, bureaucracy, military)
Describe Elite recruitment
Election type (PR or SMD)
Civil Society
Media
Economy (scope of government intervention)
Political parties (opposition)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)